"The guy who takes the blame for every fukkin issue and every single fukkin problem on VoyeurClouds and VCity. The guy who calculates the popularity stars of more than 100,000 users (for everyone of them) while taking his shower in the morning and enters them into the system while having breakfast - every day."
Alritie: Done with the "box" for smartphone users...done with the extra D/L button, done with a lot of other fukkin little bits to counted and divided for all kind of devices...done with all that shit...hahahaha
We all hope you like. Any new bugs? We changed 300 lines of code today....
it's your call..opinions needed regarding VC 2.0 smartphone layout (thats layout for devices smaller than tablets):
The dilemma: Smartphones use different types of "manouvering" the screen and different short cuts. Basically every type of click, tap, double click, drag is already taken by one or another mobile smartphone and there is no standard! That means: Our zoom-function on an image either interferes with "scroll down" or with "save as" or with "send to printer" or something else...everything you can imagine seems to be taken depending on the type of device you are using.
That means: No matter what we code, instead of our zoom your smart phone asks to save the pic instead of opening it, or if you try to save it, it opens the zoom or it scrolls down or whatever...crazy shit of today "non standardized human machine interaction".
The only solution which comes to my mind right now: Add button for mobile users. But hey: Our mission was to have less space for controls on mobiles and more space for the "net-content", which is the image.
That would mean: Hide all freaking buttons on mobiles unless somebody wants to see and use them. Now my question to the posters here: How much of the information below each post would you OK to hide on small devices? The link to your blog? The PM? The tags? Maybe even your story? The link to your comment page? Hide means: The standard mobile would not show these until "show buttons or whatever" would be clicked on a post. of course we can reduce it to a plain photo show..which would be the extreme..but hey: As far as I know our "lazy" users, only one out of 100 would realistically open the accompanying information,,and that can lead to frustration of the posters.
On the other hand: Thinking about the old version we had: Mobile users were not able to read or click any of the small printed meta information beneath the posts unless they used two fingers to zoom on that line, read it, and then zoom back to move on to the next...please consider this too!
We spent the last 4 days on fine-tuning, debugging and beautification...I hope you can tell a little difference: The new pages start looking much smoother now.
From Wednesday on we will move the Voyeurclouds pages to VC2.0
After that we have another round of debugging and finetuning. Once that is done, we will start with the following agenda:
• Enable HD Movie quality for your videos • Replace Videochat by new software • Update Text-Chat sofware • Move Hall of Fame to VC2.0 layout • Integrate Tit-Flash into VC • Open new VCity functions like enhanced Messaging, Rotation of wrongly recorded Videos, and and and...(not going to tell you right now..hehehe)
I can hardly give you any realistic time frame. A single task like "Enable HD Movie Quality" might take only one day or might consume 2 weeks (if things go really bad because of things we might not have thought of..)
Hi all, we now switched the blog walls and your guestbooks and your blogs to VC2.0.
The crew is now divided into two teams: One team is moving ahead to switch further pages while the other crew is busy to "clean the fukkin dust" that the first crew left behind..which means to debug and finetune. Within the last 24 hours we corrected and finetuned 87 issues..covering every single item which was reported until last nite.
I am sure the new blogs and guestbooks will need further finetuning too ... so please do not hesitate to leave your wishes and problems right here beneath my post. Please include the type of device you are using! The layout adjusts itself to your device and looks different on different devices..at least it should..hehehe
That's s a very good page to understand what I mean when talking about liquid/floating elements. Open that page and now change the size of your browser window (if you are on a comp!)...make your window more and more narrow. Watch the elements floating left and right and watch the menu bar changing to a mobile device menu bar!
Yes, we also tried to switch the blog pages but it did not go well..the fukkin pic upload did fukkin generate fukkin bugs all over the fukkin place and we now have a fukkin error log of fukkin 2.4 gig fukking file size to fukkin look fukkin into that fukkin problem ... although it performs well on the internal test sibling site, which is fukkin supposed to be fukkin all the same same and does not create any fukkin problems there. Anyways - after 2 fukkin hours of trying to fix the problem I switched back and will hopefully try again tomorrow....
Please please: Report any issues you might have on any of the new pages. IF you report a problem please let us know what kind of device and what kind of web-browser you were using. The pages look totally different on different devices!!!
Posted for
Unregistered Guests, VCitizens, VResidents
by
Igor (
)
Igor: I am sorry to inform you that JAY posting under http://jaybirdxxx.igorsclouds.com is in fact a compilation of 5 different porn stars. It was not that easy toi locate the original source, because Jay not only added a pussy piercing (photoshop) to her pics but also altered the color temperature, saturation and gradient levels - which made it impossible to find the original pics thru our image search bots. Well..well..here is one of 14 proofs that our screener put together. The upper pic is "JAY", the pic beneath is the original...a porn star pic from 2003.
The arrows show some details on the original pic which cannot be accidentally the same..water drops are always random.
Enjoy our screener playing Sherlock Holmes and sorry for the fakers on VCity.
Igor
PS: We will leave Jays blog open for the next 12 hours so you can look at her pics and check out the photo shopped pussy piercings....two of them are real and the rest have been photoshopped onto the pics. And you can also look at other details: Jay has 5 different nipples for example...hehehe
Within the next few minutes we will switch the entire system to VC 2.0. THIS IS A SHORT TEST! After we collected our results (which are all about workload and nothing else) we will switch back. There is no reason to post error reports: We are fully aware of some little bugs and missing finetuning at this point !!!
You can consider yourself lab rats or the first few users who get an idea of our new system..whatever you prefer...hehehe
Your opinion needed: This s what I picked as the general layout for the "single post page" layout on huge computer screens. (Things still missing on the screen grab are the "LICK BUTTON" and the "FEEDBACK" below.
We added much more info to that page: On the right side you have - search field - General Posting Category of that post - A silver medal for any post which made it to the "hottest new posts" as well as a gold medal for every Hall of Fame post Then you information about the poster: - A round mini tropic - Popularity (will replace Reputation) presented by number of red hearts - And since when is this poster posting
Followed by buttons which go to related tag walls.
Followed by any theme contest this post might participate in
What you think? Overloaded? Or good? What about the colors??? I cannot make up my mind, whether to show the tags and title in bright orange or a very neutral grey?!
You input and thoughts are very much appreciated!!